Hi! > Thanks for your _prompt_ response! > > > > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > > > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > > > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > > > > > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > > > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > > > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > > > flow? > > > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that > > important to begin with, > > Reference counting disbalance is not critical, but what is then? Things with end-user impact. What is end-user impact here? How much memory is leaked in usual config? Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
