On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:26:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Hi! > > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > flow? What outstanding patches have not been handled? Have you talked to Pavel about this? > *) e.g. I have a series against a few drivers in LED with actual fixes > and it is missed v5.13 (okay, that time Pavel had comments which I > have addressed at ~rc7 time frame), missed v5.14 and seems on the > curve to miss v5.15. If you address something at -rc7 you should not expect the changes to be merged in time for the next release, what would you do if you were on the other end? > P.S. I Cc'ed lately active, AFAICS, in that area people + Greg for his opinion. I think that Pavel should be the one asking for help here if he needs it. greg k-h
