Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >> I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is
> >> a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that
> >> someone can help Pavel to sort things out.
> >>
> >> In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do
> >> in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a
> >> (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch
> >> flow?
> > 
> > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that
> > important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because
> > you pushed a bit too hard.
> > 
> > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No,
> > LED subsystem is not orphaned.
> 
> It is good to hear that you are still actively maintaining the LED
> subsystem, thank you.
> 
> This thread does remind me that I was planning on re-sending this
> LED patch which seems to have fallen through the cracks:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20210221115208.105203-1-hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Can you pick this one up please? Or shall I resend it?

Thanks, applied.

							Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux