Hi! > >>> so now we have > >>> device:color:function > >>> what if we made it so that there was a 4th part of LED name, ie > >>> group:device:color:function > >>> ? > >>> > >>> Would this be a problem? > >> > >> Indeed, the device alone would not be a sufficient differentiator > >> since it is possible to have more than one LED controller of the > >> same type on the board. > >> > >> Nonetheless, I'd rather avoid the addition of a new generic section. > >> Probably we would have to make it specific to this device. > >> > > > > Ok, in that case I will do it so that devicename is "omnia". > > devicename_mandatory should be set to true, yes? > > If you want to have four sections then you must compose LED > name yourself and not use new *ext() API. But please hold on, > since I suppose Pavel will have something to add to that. Lets just handle global brightness outside LED subsystem. And drop the omnia: .. it is useless. For some of your leds it should be "ethX:...:activity". Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
