Re: Cleanups in "next" tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pavel

On 4/3/20 1:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 4/3/20 12:57 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sun 2020-03-22 14:35:56, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Hi Pavel,

On 3/22/20 12:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

I've commited some cleanups into LED tree ( git/pavel/linux-leds.git
branch for-next ), if someone wants to review them.
You abused your maintainer power by bypassing the usual patch
submission procedure. Please remove the patches from linux-next
and submit them officially for discussion. I would have some objections
to them.
I'm sorry I failed to meet your high expectations... But I don't
believe I done anything completely outside of usual kernel procedures.
I believe code review is quite usual kernel procedure.

Could you list the patches and objections you have?
I already expressed my concerns regarding Turris Omnia patch.

My comments regarding remaining patches:

- "Make label "white:power" to be consistent with"

I disagree here. "system" was OK.

- "Warn about old defines that probably should not be used."

Obsolete is only LED_FULL, so the comment is in wrong line

I would prefer to have the commit sha that obsoleted the LED_FULL to be referenced in the commit message so we have traceability.

Dan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux