Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: update TI tps6105x chip bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:

> Hi Lee, thank you for the review.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 7:32 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Tree: next-20191118
> >
> > Why is this in your commit message?
> 
> I have been posting patches against various maintainer trees lately, which
> will not apply to mainline or next. So I have been including base tree
> information in the patch itself.
> 
> Base-tree info on patches is high on developers' wish list, but not yet
> standardized. This was discussed at the 2019 kernel maintainers
> summit:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/803619/

NB: I haven't seen this discussion (or opened this link just yet).

It's no problem to have it in the submission, but it would be better
to have it *below* the '--' with the diff, such that if it is applied,
it doesn't end up in the kernel's Git history.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux