On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:50 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > pon., 11 lis 2019 o 09:08 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Convert the binding document for MAX77650 core MFD module to YAML. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.txt | 46 ------ > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.yaml | 149 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.txt > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.yaml > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > FYI this series is already in next through Rob's DT tree. > > Why don't I see an 'applied' email? There was discussion about it in the cover letter. With the schema for MFDs, we need to merge all the schema thru one tree because the main schema references the child node schemas. Otherwise, 'make dt_binding_check' will start failing (as Linus' tree is now). Perhaps we should encourage they be a single patche because 1) child devices alone don't make sense and 2) it will be clear not to apply each separately. Rob
