Dan,
On 10/25/19 7:57 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jacek
>
> On 10/22/19 12:41 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> On 10/22/19 6:37 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> On 10/18/19 4:56 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/19 11:48 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>> Dan,
>>>> + ret = lp5xx_parse_channel_child(child, cfg, i);
>>>>> I went into details of this parsing and finally came up with
>>>>> the code which is a bit greater in size, but IMHO cleaner.
>>>>> Note changes in variable naming. It is not even compile-tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> static int lp55xx_parse_common_child(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>>>>> int led_number, int *chan_nr)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> of_property_read_string(np, "chan-name",
>>>>> &cfg[led_number].name);
>>>>> of_property_read_u8(np, "led-cur",
>>>>> &cfg[led_number].led_current);
>>>>> of_property_read_u8(np, "max-cur",
>>>>> &cfg[led_number].max_current);
>>>>>
>>>>> ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", chan_nr);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (chan_nr < 0 || chan_nr > cfg->max_chan_nr) /* side note:
>>>>> new
>>>>> max_chan_nr property needed in cfg */
>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int lp55xx_parse_mutli_led_child(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> struct lp55xx_led_config
>>>>> *cfg,
>>>>> int child_number,
>>>>> int color_number)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int chan_nr, color_id;
>>>>>
>>>>> ret = lp55xx_parse_common_child(child, cfg, child_number,
>>>>> color_number,
>>>>> &chan_nr);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "color", &color_id);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> cfg[child_number].color_components[color_number].color_id =
>>>>> color_id;
>>>>>
>>>>> cfg[child_number].color_components[color_number].output_num =
>>>>> chan_nr;
>>>>> set_bit(color_id, &cfg[child_number].available_colors);
>>>>>
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> staitc int lp55xx_parse_mutli_led(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>>>>> int child_number)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct device_node *child;
>>>>> int num_colors = 0, i = 0;
>>>> s/, i = 0//
>>>>
>>>>> for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>>>>> ret = lp55xx_parse_mutli_led_child(child, cfg,
>>>>> num_colors,
>>>>> child_number, i))
>>>> Replace above call with below:
>>>>
>>>> ret = lp55xx_parse_mutli_led_child(child, cfg, child_number,
>>>> num_colors);
>>>>
>>> I applied your DT parser patch from the v13 series. Which eliminates
>>> this comment correct?
>> Yes, it contains this fix.
>>
> OK I added your patch and it broke a lot of the DT parsing for the LP55xx.
>
> I would prefer to stick with the original code without having to
> re-write this again.
Let me test that with Qemu first.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
