Re: [PATCH 2/3] bitmap: Rename module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/27/24 12:24 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Rename module to bitmap_kunit and rename the configuration option
>> compliant with kunit framework.
>>
>> Cc: kees@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                           |  2 +-
>>   lib/Kconfig.debug                     | 15 ++++++++-------
>>   lib/Makefile                          |  2 +-
>>   lib/{test_bitmap.c => bitmap_kunit.c} |  0
>>   4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>   rename lib/{test_bitmap.c => bitmap_kunit.c} (100%)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 12b870712da4a..289b727344d64 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -3814,13 +3814,13 @@ F:    include/linux/find.h
>>   F:    include/linux/nodemask.h
>>   F:    include/linux/nodemask_types.h
>>   F:    include/vdso/bits.h
>> +F:    lib/bitmap_kunit.c
>>   F:    lib/bitmap-str.c
>>   F:    lib/bitmap.c
>>   F:    lib/cpumask.c
>>   F:    lib/cpumask_kunit.c
>>   F:    lib/find_bit.c
>>   F:    lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
>> -F:    lib/test_bitmap.c
>>   F:    tools/include/linux/bitfield.h
>>   F:    tools/include/linux/bitmap.h
>>   F:    tools/include/linux/bits.h
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index a30c03a661726..6bb02990a73e7 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -2420,13 +2420,6 @@ config TEST_PRINTF
>>   config TEST_SCANF
>>       tristate "Test scanf() family of functions at runtime"
>>   -config TEST_BITMAP
>> -    tristate "Test bitmap_*() family of functions at runtime"
>> -    help
>> -      Enable this option to test the bitmap functions at boot.
>> -
>> -      If unsure, say N.
>> -
> 
> This change will take away the ability to run bitmap tests during
> boot on a non-kunit kernel.
Kees, what opinion do you have on this? [1] has all the discussion though
and my recent thoughts on why I sent this patch.

> 
> Nack on this change. I wan to see all tests that are being removed
> from lib because they have been converted - also it doesn't make
> sense to convert some tests like this one that add the ability test
> during boot.
> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux