Re: Repo for tests which fail currently?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:45:12PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> for my talk at EOSS23 about object life-time issues[1], I created a
> loose set of tests checking some longstanding problems in the Linux
> Kernel. I would like to improve these tests. Now, I wonder where I could
> contribute them to because their scope seems different to me. They are
> not for regression testing because I don't have a fix for most of them.
> Some fixes mean rewriting private data allocations for a whole subsystem
> and drivers. The tests are rather meant for documenting known problems
> and checking if someone started working on it. But it seems that
> kselftest (and LTP also?) only accept tests which do not fail by
> default. The question is now, is there another test collection project I
> could contribute these tests to? I'd be very happy for pointers, I
> started looking around but to no avail...

Why not just add them to the kernel tree, with ksft_test_result_skip()
being the result for now while they still fail, and then when the kernel
code is fixed up, change that back to the correct
ksft_test_result_error() call instead?

"SKIP" is a good thing to take advantage of here.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux