On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 8:02 AM Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_*_MSG_ASSERTION() macros with
> KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(), the assert_type parameter was not always
> correctly transferred. Specifically, the following errors were
> introduced:
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() uses KUNIT_ASSERTION
> - KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
> - KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
>
> A failing KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() test thus prevents further tests from
> running, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_{LT,GT}_MSG() tests do not prevent
> further tests from running. This is contrary to the documentation,
> which states that failing KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros allow further tests to
> run, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros should prevent this.
>
> Revert the KUNIT_{ASSERTION,EXPECTATION} switches to fix the behaviour
> for the affected macros.
>
> Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for catching this!
I scanned over the file again looking for other errors. I think this
patch fixes all of them.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
