When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_*_MSG_ASSERTION() macros with
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(), the assert_type parameter was not always
correctly transferred. Specifically, the following errors were
introduced:
- KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() uses KUNIT_ASSERTION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
A failing KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() test thus prevents further tests from
running, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_{LT,GT}_MSG() tests do not prevent
further tests from running. This is contrary to the documentation,
which states that failing KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros allow further tests to
run, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros should prevent this.
Revert the KUNIT_{ASSERTION,EXPECTATION} switches to fix the behaviour
for the affected macros.
Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index c958855681cc..840a2c375065 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do { \
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
+ KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
left, <=, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ do { \
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
left, <, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ do { \
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
left, >, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
--
2.37.2
