[PATCH] kunit: fix assert_type for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_LE_MSG_ASSERTION() with
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION() for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(), the assert_type
parameter was changed from KUNIT_EXPECTATION to KUNIT_ASSERTION.  This
causes KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() and KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG() to behave the
same way, and tests after a failed KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() are not run.

Call KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTIO() with KUNIT_EXPECTATION for again match
the documented behavior for KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros.

Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/kunit/test.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index c958855681cc..617ec995671d 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do {									       \
 
 #define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...)		       \
 	KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test,				       \
-				   KUNIT_ASSERTION,			       \
+				   KUNIT_EXPECTATION,			       \
 				   left, <=, right,			       \
 				   fmt,					       \
 				    ##__VA_ARGS__)
-- 
2.37.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux