On 11/3/21 4:31 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 11/1/21 10:34 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
Extending these flags using the existing (1 << x) pattern triggers
complaints from checkpatch.
Instead of ignoring checkpatch modify the existing values to use BIT(x)
style in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This one could be sent outside of this patch set since you are not
adding new values. Patch sets > 20 are generally frowned upon; sending
this one separately helps get the number down.
In the past I've seen maintainers pick small cleanups and fixes from
longer series that otherwise need further discussion.
Not sure if this practice is also common for netdev so I posted this
patch separately.
--
Regards,
Leonard
