On 11/1/21 10:34 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote: > Extending these flags using the existing (1 << x) pattern triggers > complaints from checkpatch. > > Instead of ignoring checkpatch modify the existing values to use BIT(x) > style in a separate commit. > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > This one could be sent outside of this patch set since you are not adding new values. Patch sets > 20 are generally frowned upon; sending this one separately helps get the number down.
