On 6/10/21 9:45 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 6/10/21 1:30 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Rename symbols for better clarity:
* 'eenter' might be confused for directly calling ENCLU[EENTER]. It does
not. It calls into the VDSO, which actually has the EENTER instruction.
* 'sgx_call_vdso' is *only* used for entering the enclave. It's not some
generic SGX call into the VDSO.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
These all look fine to me. Feel free to add my ack on them.
Since these are pure x86 selftests and the initial code went through the
x86 maintainers, should these got through them as well? Or, since this
is only selftest code, should Shuah pick them up?
I will queue these up for 5.14-rc1
thanks,
-- Shuah
