Shuah, The report sent was meant to be a general summary, rather than a deep dive, of the results. Most of that information can be gathered by viewing the test details. > * Test details: > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20200915 If you open that link in a web browser, there are a number of ways to dig down into the results. If you have questions about the best ways to do this, please let me know. Maybe that isn't the best way? I'm very open to feedback. I just tried to best copy the previous report that was being sent out to start. Please feel free to ask any questions you have or provide me with feedback. I'm here to help. Thanks, Justin On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 15:18, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/15/20 11:52 AM, Justin Cook wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Linaro had previously been sending out a report based on our testing of > > the linux kernel using kselftest. We paused sending that report to fix a > > few issues. We are now continuing the process, starting with this report. > > > > If you have any questions, comments, feedback, or concerns please email > > lkft@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > Hi Justin, > > Thanks for the report. It would be nice to see the reports. However, it > is hard for me to determine which tests failed and why. > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:44, LKFT <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > ## Kernel > > * kernel: 5.9.0-rc5 > > * git repo: > > ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git', > > 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next'] > > * git branch: master > > * git commit: 6b02addb1d1748d21dd1261e46029b264be4e5a0 > > * git describe: next-20200915 > > * Test details: > > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20200915 > > > > ## Regressions (compared to build next-20200914) > > > > juno-r2: > > kselftest: > > * memfd_memfd_test > > > > x86: > > kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native: > > * kvm_vmx_preemption_timer_test > > I looked for the above two failures to start with since these > are regressions and couldn't find them. > > Are the regressions tied to new commits in linux-next from the > mm and kvm trees? > > thanks, > -- Shuah >
