On 9/15/20 11:52 AM, Justin Cook wrote:
Hello,
Linaro had previously been sending out a report based on our testing of
the linux kernel using kselftest. We paused sending that report to fix a
few issues. We are now continuing the process, starting with this report.
If you have any questions, comments, feedback, or concerns please email
lkft@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report. It would be nice to see the reports. However, it
is hard for me to determine which tests failed and why.
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:44, LKFT <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
## Kernel
* kernel: 5.9.0-rc5
* git repo:
['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git',
'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next']
* git branch: master
* git commit: 6b02addb1d1748d21dd1261e46029b264be4e5a0
* git describe: next-20200915
* Test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20200915
## Regressions (compared to build next-20200914)
juno-r2:
kselftest:
* memfd_memfd_test
x86:
kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native:
* kvm_vmx_preemption_timer_test
I looked for the above two failures to start with since these
are regressions and couldn't find them.
Are the regressions tied to new commits in linux-next from the
mm and kvm trees?
thanks,
-- Shuah
