Hi Justin, On 9/17/20 9:52 AM, Justin Cook wrote:
Shuah, The report sent was meant to be a general summary, rather than a deep dive, of the results. Most of that information can be gathered by viewing the test details.* Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20200915If you open that link in a web browser, there are a number of ways to dig down into the results. If you have questions about the best ways to do this, please let me know.
Yes. I did look at the results. It isn't easy to figure out. It would help is cc'ing the test authors in addition to the list. There are two failed tests if recall correctly, mm and kvm. cc'ing and subsystem mailing lists and authors for the last commit for the test in question will get you results quickly.
Maybe that isn't the best way? I'm very open to feedback. I just tried to best copy the previous report that was being sent out to start.
We had the same problem with the previous report. It just tells you which tests regressed. It is a good start. Unfortunately without tagging test authors/maintainers it won't get addressed. thanks, -- Shuah
