The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
pass.
Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void)
{
int *rcv_fd, nodes;
- if (numa_available() < 0)
- error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+ if (numa_available() < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support");
+ return 0;
+ }
nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
