From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100
> The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The
> test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
> pass.
>
> Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
I don't know about this.
The test did not pass. So it should not be "skipped with a pass".
We were unable to run it at all, which means we don't know if it
would pass or fail. This means there is a third state besides
pass or fail which we must acknowledge and implement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
