The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped.
Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..c9f478b40996 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <numa.h>
+#include "../kselftest.h"
+
static const int PORT = 8888;
static void build_rcv_group(int *rcv_fd, size_t len, int family, int proto)
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ int main(void)
int *rcv_fd, nodes;
if (numa_available() < 0)
- error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+ ksft_exit_skip("no numa api support\n");
nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
--
2.17.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
