On 4/14/24 4:23 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
Can it be nicer to use the word “interface” instead of “if” in the summary phrase?
"if" for interface is a term used in the network stack, but I can see why it is confusing. Can submit a v2.
When bringing down the TX rings we flush the rings but forget to reclaimed the flushed packets. This lead to a memory leak since we do not free the dma mapped buffers. …I find this change description improvable. * How do you think about to avoid typos? * Would another imperative wording be more desirable?
The change description makes sense to me. Can you be a bit more specific as to what isn't clear here?
Thanks, Justin
Regards, Markus
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
