Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: devicetree: fix refcount leak in pinctrl_dt_to_map()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>                   … Because the pinctrl_dt_free_maps() includes the
> droping operation, here we call it directly.

I find this change description improvable.

* How do you think about to avoid a typo?

* Would another imperative wording be more desirable?

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux