>>> When bringing down the TX rings we flush the rings but forget to >>> reclaimed the flushed packets. This lead to a memory leak since we >>> do not free the dma mapped buffers. … >> >> I find this change description improvable. >> >> * How do you think about to avoid typos? >> >> * Would another imperative wording be more desirable? > > The change description makes sense to me. Can you be a bit more specific as to what isn't clear here? Spelling suggestions: + … forget to reclaim … + … This leads to … Advices from a corresponding known information source: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc4#n94 Regards, Markus
