On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 09:55:16AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to > > iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'. > > > > Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer. > > Data is written directly at the correct place. > > Makes sense. > > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued and pushed, thank you all! Thanx, Paul
