process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.
Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
Data is written directly at the correct place.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index 2c2648a3ad30..861485d865ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/stat.h>
@@ -890,31 +891,36 @@ static u64 process_durations(int n)
{
int i;
struct reader_task *rt;
- char buf1[64];
+ struct seq_buf s;
char *buf;
u64 sum = 0;
buf = kmalloc(800 + 64, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return 0;
- buf[0] = 0;
+
+ seq_buf_init(&s, buf, 800 + 64);
+
sprintf(buf, "Experiment #%d (Format: <THREAD-NUM>:<Total loop time in ns>)",
exp_idx);
for (i = 0; i < n && !torture_must_stop(); i++) {
rt = &(reader_tasks[i]);
- sprintf(buf1, "%d: %llu\t", i, rt->last_duration_ns);
if (i % 5 == 0)
- strcat(buf, "\n");
- if (strlen(buf) >= 800) {
+ seq_buf_putc(&s, '\n');
+
+ if (seq_buf_used(&s) >= 800) {
+ seq_buf_terminate(&s);
pr_alert("%s", buf);
- buf[0] = 0;
+ seq_buf_clear(&s);
}
- strcat(buf, buf1);
+
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "%d: %llu\t", i, rt->last_duration_ns);
sum += rt->last_duration_ns;
}
+ seq_buf_terminate(&s);
pr_alert("%s\n", buf);
kfree(buf);
--
2.34.1
