Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process_durations()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.

Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
Data is written directly at the correct place.

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux