* Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The surprising thing is the Clang doesn't detect the bug either. It's > strange. (I found this bug with Smatch). Yeah, that's weird and kind of concerning. I don't think either compiler is able to see that the init function return values are always ignored. I had to dig into init/main.c to convince myself. > Also I notice that my Fixes tag wasn't correct either. That patch did > have a missing error code bug, but "ret" was set to zero. :/ Yeah, so I left the Fixes tag out of the commit anyway, because this isn't really a fix that -stable should concern itself with. After the first commit it's not even a fix per se, but an improvement in the resolution & meaning of error codes or so. Thanks, Ingo
