On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 09:30:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Ugh, why on Earth didn't GCC warn about this? The bad pattern is pretty > simple & obvious once pointed out ... compilers should have no trouble > realizing that 'ret' is returned uninitialized in some of these control > paths. Yet not a peep from the compiler ... We disabled that warning years ago (5?) because GCC had too many false positives. regards, dan carpenter
