> Ben has explained this problem: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1249592/ > Since the caller will check "pclk" on failure, we don't need to free > "clk" in gm20b_clk_new() and I think this patch is no longer needed. * I am curious if it can become easier to see the relationships for these variables according to mentioned “destructor” calls. * Did you notice opportunities to improve source code analysis (or software documentation) accordingly? Regards, Markus
