> When gk20a_clk_ctor() returns an error code, pointer "clk" > should be released. Such an information is reasonable. > It's the same when gm20b_clk_new() returns from elsewhere following this call. I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. Can it be that the allocated clock object should be kept usable even after a successful return from this function? Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message? Regards, Markus
