On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > The original patch was basically fine. > > I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. > > * Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after > a successful return from this function? Heh. You're right. The patch is freeing "clk" on the success path so that doesn't work. regards, dan carpenter
