>> Why did you not reply directly with this request for the update steps >> with the subject “Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation >> in tpm_…()”? >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009405/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009415/ >> >> I find that there can be difficulty to show an appropriate information >> source for the reasonable explanation of this change pattern. >> > > Shouldn't this information source for the explanation be the submitter? I offered a bit of information. I agree that it could become better eventually. > I'd hope they understand what it is they are submitting. I do this to some degree. ;-) But I would appreciate if I could refer to a single Linux document for this change pattern around questionable error messages. Would a corresponding link for an accepted explanation in the documentation be nice in this case? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
