On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 14:58 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:50 +0000, Alexander.Steffen@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > > > > Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences > > > > > as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding > > > > > size > > > > > determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style > > > > > convention. > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch does one style in favor of the other. > > > > > > I actually prefer that style, so I'd welcome this change :) > > > > Style changes should be reviewed and documented, like any other code > > change, and added to Documentation/process/coding-style.rst or an > > equivalent file. > > Actually, it has been there for many years: > > 14) Allocating memory > --------------------- > ... > The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following: > > .. code-block:: c > > p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...); > > The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability and > introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is changed > but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator is not. True, thanks for the reminder. Is this common in new code? Is there a script/ or some other automated way of catching this usage before patches are upstreamed? Just as you're doing here, the patch description should reference this in the patch description. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
