Re: [PATCH 5/6] GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt_data()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't be a dummy...  This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
>
> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.  But asking
> pointless rhetorical questions is not helpful.
>
> A lot of people are CC'd and you're wasting everyone's time by asking
> questions where you know the answer.

Fair enough, sorry for the noise.

To be honest, I did only look at the patches, not who they were from. We
have CI for drm/i915, but I don't think it's constructive to keep
changing drivers like this where the upstream isn't actively developed
and tested. But I digress. It's up to Patrik anyway.

BR,
Jani.



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux