On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200 > > A single error message should be sufficient to inform about > the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end. > Thus return after the logging call in this case directly. Did you test this? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mid_bios.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mid_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mid_bios.c > index 9004d30..e5cece0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mid_bios.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mid_bios.c > @@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static void mid_get_vbt_data(struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv) > break; > default: > dev_err(dev->dev, "Unknown revision of GCT!\n"); > + return; > } > > out: -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
