> Not really. > > That'd only find an additional > sscanf > (buf, > foo, > bar); > > And that's quite unlikely. > I fail to see the issue if it matches everything matched by /\bsscanf\b\s*(/, plus one additional case that is unlikey, but still valid. I can do a patch the $line match you described, but I'd prefer to do what I previously described. Thanks again for your feedback. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
