On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 13:24 -0800, Kevin Wern wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's a single line sscanf vs multi-line sscanf issue > > > > $line works on > > ret = sscanf(buf, &foo, &bar); > > > > $stat works on that and > > ret = sscanf(buf, > > &foo, > > &bar); > > > > Ah, ok. I dont think having just the ending paren will work though > because the > paren can be on the next line, so the pre-patch statement is most > correct. > What we should do, then, is something like: Not really. That'd only find an additional sscanf (buf, foo, bar); And that's quite unlikely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html