On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 00:29 -0800, Kevin Wern wrote: > There is a section of checkpatch.pl that intends to ensure the return > value of sscanf is always checked. However, in certain cases, like in > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc.mod.c, the symbol for sscanf is used without > calling the function: > > static const struct modversion_info ____versions[] > __used > __attribute__((section("__versions"))) = { > ... > { 0x20c55ae0, __VMLINUX_SYMBOL_STR(sscanf) }, > ... > }; > > This currently results in a warning, which is undesirable. We should > adjust the script's first regex condition to match *calls* to sscanf, > not just the symbol itself. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wern <kevin.m.wern@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index 0147c91..199247d 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -5452,7 +5452,7 @@ sub process { > # check for naked sscanf > if ($^V && $^V ge 5.10.0 && > defined $stat && > - $line =~ /\bsscanf\b/ && > + $line =~ /\bsscanf\b\s*$balanced_parens/ && No, that won't work. That's what the $stat line is for I suppose it could be /\bsscanf\s*\(/ though -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html