On 25 February 2015 at 18:13, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Sergei Antonov wrote: >> Right you are. >> I would also add 2 things: >> 1. CC the author of the last patch (the one which introduced it). > > Huh? Sougata is CC'd. I didn't add a fixes: tag because this is just a > cleanup and has no effect on runtime. > >> 2. Unify the way the return code from hfsplus_cat_build_key() is >> checked. Now it has two flavours: "if (unlikely(err < 0))" and "if >> (unlikely(err))". The latter is better. > > I'm a bit confused. > 1) This function uses "if (unlikely(err)) " consistently. The last patch https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/89ac9b4d3d1a049ae1054f99b1aed81092cd0a82#diff-37a74f715b10ff2d442d82812c89e874 intruduced "if (unlikely(err < 0))" in fs/hfsplus/dir.c for example, but "if (unlikely(err))" in fs/hfsplus/catalog.c > 2) I don't see how any of that relates to this patch?? This patch is not bad. But I'd rather see a bigger "Fix the last commit" patch rather than "Add missing braces". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
