> However there are other lots of static check warnings that do need > manual check, which are now reported via private emails to Yuanhan and > me. If any one is interested in analyzing these possibly false > warnings and making bug fixing patches out of them, you'll be warmly > welcomed! :-) If you could send me any Coccinelle warnings with both the report and the concerned file, I would be happy to take a look at them, as time permits. > However it also means you'll not see many of the responses from the > developers. Since the majority trees are not tied to a mailing list, > many reports will become private emails if not CC kernel-janitors. Personally, I am more interested in just being aware of what is going on, but it is a good point that without a mailing list, there is no record of the whole exchange, which is probably unfortunate. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html