On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > What's your opinion on below alternative patch? > > In addition to yours it makes would-overflow visible. > > > > It does not check for output buffer having non-zero size but > > as callers are local with #defined buffer size I don't think that would > > be needed. > > > > Sorry for the delay. Looks good to me. I am picking Bruno's patch. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
