On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET) > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx> > >> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500 > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Julia Lawall wrote: > >> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free) > >> >> expression. Drop one initialization. > >> >> > >> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is: > >> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > >> >> > >> >> // <smpl> > >> >> @forall@ > >> >> idexpression *x; > >> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR; > >> >> @@ > >> >> > >> >> x = f(...) > >> >> ... when != x > >> >> ( > >> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...) > >> >> | > >> >> * x = f(...) > >> >> ) > >> >> // </smpl> > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx> > >> > >> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final > >> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit. > > > > I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem. > > If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you > > received? > > You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission. > > I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when > resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some > technical submission problem. > > Thanks. OK, I will keep that in mind. Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they are the same... julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
