Manish Katiyar wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Below is the updated patch > > Hi Stefan, > > Has this been accepted, or is it still not worth it ? Your last posting looked good to me. But I am not the one to take it; I just looked at the thread coincidentally. One thing that wasn't answered in the discussion is whether device_initcall is not only the equivalent but also the /best/ replacement of __initcall, specifically for kallsyms_init. (Maybe it should be something else; then a mechanical replacement by device_initcall would lower awareness of the issue --- if there is an issue. There probably isn't, but I don't know.) -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= --== ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
