On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:49:21PM +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmm.....after doing the changes when I saw the md5sum they are >> >> different :-( . Considering that I have done only whitespace fixes, >> >> few comments which exceeded 80 cols and replacing __initcall with >> >> device_initcall(). The sizes of object files are same. >> >> How should I go about finding why is the difference ? >> > >> > Binary search undoing your changes one-by-one. >> > >> > My bet is that it is either: >> > 1) Move of EXPORT_SYMBOL >> > 2) Delete one line where you moved an opening brace >> > >> > The approch here is simple. >> > Split the patch is two parts. >> > One that keep the md5 sum, and a second much smaller patch that impact >> > the md5 sum. In this way you make it easier to review the changes that >> > impact the md5 sum. >> >> Hi Sam, >> >> I am bit confused, apparently it looks like change in comments is >> causing md5sum to change. See the output below. > > Thats because your change add an extra line. And __LINE__ is used > by BUG_ON later in the file - so now it sees a new line numbers > and thus md5 sum changes. Ohhh.......thanks a lot Sam, I would have never guessed that. Till now I always felt comments are harmless. In that case should I split them in a separate patch even if they are just simple changes in comments ? Thanks - Manish > > Sam > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html