Manish Katiyar wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:49:21PM +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote: >>> I am bit confused, apparently it looks like change in comments is >>> causing md5sum to change. See the output below. >> Thats because your change add an extra line. And __LINE__ is used >> by BUG_ON later in the file - so now it sees a new line numbers >> and thus md5 sum changes. > > Ohhh.......thanks a lot Sam, I would have never guessed that. Till now > I always felt comments are harmless. In that case should I split them > in a separate patch even if they are just simple changes in comments ? Such a split makes only sense in larger patches where the md5sum check helps easing the mind of reviewers. A flood of trivial patches is not very welcome either. BTW, if you start adjusting the style of comments in this file, then I suggest you change all multi-line comments to the canonical style in one go. Replacing one style deviation by another deviation like in <ea11fea30902180719w34e5597ufdeb25bcb183e301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> doesn't make sense. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= --=- =--=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html