Hi Mark, On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 13:33:22 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:05:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:48:44 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The reason I'm doing this is that the lack of a widely available clock > > > API is a considerable pain point for a lot of the stuff I work on and > > > this is the major blocker to just enabling the default implementation on > > > architectures that don't support it already which would be a big step > > > forwards. > > > Agreed. Please submit this patch and we can concentrate on this other > > stuff later. > > Perhaps if you give me a couple of hours... Sorry, I wasn't meaning to rush you, just agreeing that the two things are separate. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpAYKkqkPMz5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
