Hi Mark, On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:48:44 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I would definitely prefer being able to just write > > > generic-y += clkdev.h > > I agree but I don't see this as something that should block having the > facility. Or if it does I guess I'll need to try to either fix clkdev > to use the arch include optionally or go round all the architectures > either of which is going to be needlessly painful. True. > > Maybe Michal Marek or someone on the kbuild mailing list can help > > out with a solution for that. > > We could do that incrementally... Yes, indeed it should be a separate change. > The reason I'm doing this is that the lack of a widely available clock > API is a considerable pain point for a lot of the stuff I work on and > this is the major blocker to just enabling the default implementation on > architectures that don't support it already which would be a big step > forwards. Agreed. Please submit this patch and we can concentrate on this other stuff later. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpYiGcWPKs6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
