On 17.1.2012 18:20, Stephen Warren wrote: > Michal Marek wrote at Saturday, January 14, 2012 3:51 PM: >> As the C6X port has been merged in this merge window, I can't easily >> apply this patch to my kbuild branch and at the same time please Linus >> by basing the pull request on a tagged release. So I'm going to drop the >> arch/c6x part to keep the kbuild branch "pretty" and let either Mark or >> Stephen send the patch to Linus directly, once he has merged the kbuild >> branch. Would that work? > > I was assuming my patches were for 3.4 rather than 3.3, since it's pretty > late for new features in 3.3. In that case, there wouldn't be an issue, > right? OK, that was a misunderstanding then. I applied it to the kbuild branch for 3.3 and Linus pulled it in the meantime. It's not a terribly intrusive change, after all. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
